The Science Fiction Review Books Brave New World by Aldous Huxley

Brave New World by Aldous Huxley

Book Cover

My wife was surprised that I had never read Brave New World. It seemed to her that this novel by Aldous Huxley was generally considered required reading in school. She ordered it for me along with 1984 by George Orwell, which by coincidence I haven’t read either. It seems that I somehow went to the wrong schools as a kid, and missed out on some classics. I’m trying to remedy this.

I wouldn’t really call Brave New World a sci-fi novel. It’s more of a criticism of utopian society. The setting is in London around 2540 AD, where society is broken down into castes. Human reproduction is done in a “hatchery” where babies are created in bottles and subjected to varying conditions in order to guide development into one of the five classes (Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta, Epsilon). Aside from modifying biological factors, each child is “trained” with techniques ranging from aversion therapy to repeating phrases over and over when they sleep.

Each child is trained to love the position they have in society, whether it be a high ranking Alpha, or an Epsilon doing grunt work. The whole rationalization Huxley gives for this type of conditioning actually seems to make sense. He argues that you cannot have a society filled with Alphas, (everyone equal), because SOMEONE has to do the grunt work and will resent it. If you can train or brainwash someone into loving their grunt work job, i.e. janitorial, there will be no complaints.

Two of the more important parts of Alpha life are “free love” and the use of Soma, a mood enhancing drug with no side effects. Sleeping around is considered healthy, and monogamy is unheard of. Lenina Crowne, a Beta-Minus worker at the hatchery, has been harassed over going with one man for too long. Bernard Marx is an Alpha Plus that seems to idolize Lenia, and is offended when other men talk about whether or not they’ve had sex with her or not, or how many times. He’s also a social outcast because he wants to stand out and chooses not to use Soma when he’s in a bad mood. Lenina eventually accepts Bernard’s invitation to visit a “Reservation” in an attempt to keep her friends from thinking she is too attached.

This reservation is a place where humans are allowed to breed naturally, and are referred to as “Savages.” During this visit Lenina and Bernard come across a woman from London named Linda who became stranded at the reservation. Bernard takes it upon himself to rescue Linda and her son John, conceived in London and born inside the reservation, by taking them to London to “civilized” life.

This of course spawns a number of problems. Linda has no desire to re-integrate into society and goes on a non-stop “Soma holiday.” John is overwhelmed by the attention of everyone that wants to see or be around “The Savage.” Bernard is thrust into the spotlight by mere association with The Savage. Those are just a few for a short list of examples.

The ending is nothing short of bizarre. I’m not quite sure how I feel about it, but it’s safe to say I don’t think many people would expect it. Overall, this was an interesting book, but I don’t feel any special need to read it again. I found one piece of technology in the book rather interesting. There this type of entertainment called a “feely” that is essentially a movie but with a booths where senses other than sight or sound are transmitted directly into the brain. This reminded me of a section I read in The Age of Spiritual Machines by Ray Kurzweil describing the eventual development of similar technology. I wonder if he was influenced by Huxley at all.

6 thoughts on “Brave New World by Aldous Huxley”

  1. Weird…we went to the same high school and I read 1984 in school. Did you read Animal Farm?

  2. Yes, we read Animal Farm. It seems like my teachers wanted to focus on Shakespeare and Jane Austen. I remember we had to read The Agony and the Ecstacy: The Biography of Michelangelo at almost 800 pages! We must have did 3-4 essays on that book alone.

  3. Good review, as always.

    But I’m not understanding how this is not science fiction novel? Sure there is political/social criticism, but can’t the same be said about a lot of science fiction stories? What is the cutoff point when a science fiction story is no longer considered science fiction due to a story’s use of social/political criticism?

    All in good fun, of course. Just playing devil’s advocate here.

  4. About 90% of the book was focused on how society forces “hatched” humans into specific classes, and how some of those don’t accept their conditioning fully.

    I wasn’t trying to say it was not science fiction because of the criticism. The only technology that I remembered was the “hatchery” and the “feelys”. The hatchery was only part of the first 1-2 chapters, which set up the premise for the book. The feely (or sensory enhanced movie) watching happened a few times, I admit. If they were just regular movies, it wouldn’t have changed the book that much.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please prove you are a human * Time limit is exhausted. Please reload the CAPTCHA.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Post

Renowned physicist Stephen Hawking died today at age 76Renowned physicist Stephen Hawking died today at age 76

When I learned that Stephen Hawking died, I have to admit my reaction was a bit selfish. I was disappointed that he wouldn’t be able to continue contributing to science, and that the world would be a worse off place without him. I didn’t think about how his close friends and family would be impacted. I was surprised about how sad I felt as well. I can’t say I’ve ever really felt a true pang of sadness upon learning of a celebrity death. Nobody should be surprised that he died, given his long history of health problems, but nevertheless, it was shocking. So why did I react this way now? I browsed through numerous news articles and posts throughout the day today without much reaction, but I felt sad again while reading through BBC’s article on his death, and again writing this post. 

Maybe it has to do with recently reading the article “The Beginning of Time” that recently popped up in my news feed. I don’t think I could truly fully understand all of his theories, but I think his explanation here was clear enough to get a good idea. I’ve had The Theory of Everything: The Origin and Fate of the Universe audiobook on my backlog to listen to. I guess I’ll have to bump it up to next in my queue. I was already thinking about taking a break from Sci-Fi / Fantasy soon, so this makes my decision really easy.

Goodbye Stephen! Whatever the reasons, I’m truly sad you’re gone. I’m sure you will be never be forgotten by humanity, assuming we don’t destroy ourselves.

Isaac Asimov – The Last Question and The Last AnswerIsaac Asimov – The Last Question and The Last Answer

I’ve said here many times that Isaac Asimov is my favorite author. It wasn’t until a few years ago that I read “The Last Question,” Asimov’s favorite short story written by himself. Last night I stumbled across a story called “The Last Answer.” At first I thought, “hey, I’ve read this before,” then did a double-take. It was “Answer,” not “Question.” This story focused on the afterlife instead of entropy. They are both good stories, however I agree with Asimov in his opinion that “The Last Question” is better. I highly suggest reading them both, but I’m not sure what order to recommend. I’ll list the links in order of publication, so you decide. Read both stories before looking at the comments on either one, because they are filled with spoilers.

“The Last Question” – Isaac Asimov (1956)

“The Last Answer” – Isaac Asimov (1980)

Isaac Asimov would have been 90 todayIsaac Asimov would have been 90 today

Nobody is sure when exactly Isaac Asimov was born due to poor record keeping. January 2nd, 1920 was the day Isaac Asimov decided to celebrate his birthday. Along with creating the Three Laws of Robotics, Asimov also unintentionally coined the term robotics. It was first used in print when his short story “Liar!” was published in 1941. He was constantly writing in just about every area of literature. I have primarily read his Science Fiction, but he has done textbooks, humor, mystery, non-fiction, and more.

My first exposure to Asimov’s writing was when my father gave me an old worn out copy of I, Robot. I tucked the book away for a few years and eventually got around to reading it. I was so enthralled with the robots that I eventually read every robot book by him and other authors. This naturally led me to read the Foundation series which I also enjoyed, but I’ve always preferred the robot series. The Robot and Foundation books make up the biggest reading project I have ever completed. Aside from those, I’ve read a bit of his autobiography and plan on sampling some of his other writing in the near future.

By the time I discovered Asimov, he had already died. I wonder how much more he could have written had he not contracted HIV from a blood transfusion he received during heart surgery. He died of myocardial and renal complications on April 6, 1992, but the true cause of his death wasn’t publicized due to the stigma of HIV/AIDS at the time. His work has greatly influenced my love of Science Fiction, and for that I am thankful.

For more information on the life of Isaac Asimov, please visit the official Wikipedia post