The Science Fiction Review Movies I am Legend (2007) Directed by Francis Lawrence

I am Legend (2007) Directed by Francis Lawrence

First of all, I’ve never read the novel this movie is based on, so this review only refers to the movie. I might do a comparison when I read the book some time in the future. From what I’ve read, this version is just a reflection of what is in the book. With that said, I really did enjoy the movie.

Will Smith plays the quirky and somewhat paranoid Robert Neville, a scientist who appears to be the only survivor of a pandemic biological infection that crossed over from a botched attempt to find a cure for cancer. He is all alone in New York City with only his dog Sam as a companion. For some reason that he can’t explain, Neville is immune to the airborne and contact strains of the virus. Also, his dog Sam is immune only to the airborne strain.

The movie alternates between two parts of Neville’s life. The first part follows his day to day activities in the deserted and overgrown New York City covered in biohazard signs. The second part is a series of flashbacks taking place just as New York City is declared a quarantine zone. These memories come back to haunt Neville as he searches for a cure for this virus that has turned humans into zombies.

With all of the resources of New York City at his disposal, Neville strives to survive while he searches for a cure. He hunts for food and even traps zombies to test out his vaccines. He seems normal at first, but Neville isn’t exactly mentally stable. He arranges mannequins around the city and talks to them as if they are real. He checks out movies and returns them to the local video store. There is even a female mannequin that Neville doesn’t quite have the nerve to talk to just yet.

While certain points in the plot are very predictable (you’ll see what I’m talking about), others aren’t quite as cut and dry. This isn’t a typical zombie movie. There is a mix of drama, suspense, comedy, and action which I enjoyed. The audience at the theater I went to clearly didn’t appreciate the ending. I can sympathize with them to a point, but who wants a predictable ending all the time? While it wasn’t what I expected, I’m perfectly fine with the theatrical cut ending.

There is an alternate ending floating around on the internet which can be found via a simple Google search. It is even more unpredictable, and I have mixed feelings about which one I prefer. The quote, “What a hilarious misunderstanding,” courtesy of Flight of the Conchords comes to mind. According to some that have read the book, the alternate ending seems more true to the novel than the theatrical cut was.

In any case, I enjoyed the movie, and think many of you would too. Be sure to check out on DVD, which comes out March 18th.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please prove you are a human * Time limit is exhausted. Please reload the CAPTCHA.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Post

Surrogates (2009) Directed by Jonathan MostowSurrogates (2009) Directed by Jonathan Mostow

Surrogates DVD

I wasn’t really expecting much when I heard about Surrogates, so waited to watch it until it came out on DVD. From the previews it looked like many other science fiction action films that seem to be pumped out by Hollywood. The main premise of the movie is that humans live their lives through “surrogate” (robot) bodies. I’m a huge fan of Asimov and his robot novels, so this was enough to catch my attention. The human interface is kind of like how control worked in Avatar, but instead of an organic body as the host, it is robotic. I would definitely not classify the surrogates as the cyborgs that Ray Kurzweil thinks we will eventually become.  One of the main advantages to using a surrogate is that the owner is always protected, so in some ways they are better than cyborgs. There was no way for any harm to come to a user, until now.

Tom Greer, played by Bruce Willis, is in charge of investigating the destruction of a couple of surrogates. This is usually not that big of a deal, but one of the owners is found dead. Whoever wrote the script really wasn’t trying anything new as far as the murder/mystery approach is concerned. I was expecting a lot more action based on the previews that I saw. It felt like I was watching for 40 minutes before things started to get moving. This move was all around average in most respects. Nothing really stood out. It wasn’t bad, but not great.

One completely unrelated observation is that I found Bruce Willis’ upper lip (stash zone) alarmingly long. It looked almost twice the size I’d normally expect. I think of most of the roles I’ve seen him in, he’s got a beard of some sort, so that kind of hides that feature of his face. Am I alone here? Check out the pic on IMDB

So who wants to control your own personal robot?So who wants to control your own personal robot?

How would you like to control your own personal robot to do your bidding? The new movie Surrogates, starring Bruce Willis, takes this concept to extremes. In the movie, humans link their minds to a robot and control them directly. This is a bit different than being converted to a cyborg like Ray Kurzweil predicts.

As CNN reports:

“Surrogates” director Jonathan Mostow, whose film credits include 2003’s “Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines,” said he was drawn to the concept of surrogate robots as an extension of current technology. And, he said, as he met with scientists, he became convinced that something approaching the concept could one day be a reality.

It seems like the concept of “old fashioned” humanoid robots is  finally becoming outdated. I wonder how Isaac Asimov would feel? It is one thing to boss around a robot using the Second Law of Robotics, but actually mind-melding with one, or becoming one is completely different. The main dilemma in Surrogates is that someone found a way to fry someone’s brain before they were able to jack out of the robot they were controlling. This concept is very old, dating back to the old Virtual Reality plots. I was very interested in the movie when I first saw the trailer, but after reading some lackluster reviews, I think I might just wait for DVD.

The critics could be wrong though. Do any of you think I should give it a chance?

Check out the full article via CNN for more information. I found it to be an interesting read.

Arthur C. Clarke dies at age 90Arthur C. Clarke dies at age 90

Arthur C. Clarke died early this morning after a long battle with post-polio syndrome. The New York Times has an interesting summary of his life and major accomplishments. I’m ashamed to say that I still haven’t read 2001: A Space Odyssey, but it is on my ever expanding reading list. Hopefully I can review it some time in the near future. Clark is well known for his laws of prediction, which are as follows:

  1. When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible, he is almost certainly right. When he states that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong.
  2. The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is to venture a little way past them into the impossible.
  3. Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.