The Science Fiction Review Movies I am Legend (2007) Directed by Francis Lawrence

I am Legend (2007) Directed by Francis Lawrence

First of all, I’ve never read the novel this movie is based on, so this review only refers to the movie. I might do a comparison when I read the book some time in the future. From what I’ve read, this version is just a reflection of what is in the book. With that said, I really did enjoy the movie.

Will Smith plays the quirky and somewhat paranoid Robert Neville, a scientist who appears to be the only survivor of a pandemic biological infection that crossed over from a botched attempt to find a cure for cancer. He is all alone in New York City with only his dog Sam as a companion. For some reason that he can’t explain, Neville is immune to the airborne and contact strains of the virus. Also, his dog Sam is immune only to the airborne strain.

The movie alternates between two parts of Neville’s life. The first part follows his day to day activities in the deserted and overgrown New York City covered in biohazard signs. The second part is a series of flashbacks taking place just as New York City is declared a quarantine zone. These memories come back to haunt Neville as he searches for a cure for this virus that has turned humans into zombies.

With all of the resources of New York City at his disposal, Neville strives to survive while he searches for a cure. He hunts for food and even traps zombies to test out his vaccines. He seems normal at first, but Neville isn’t exactly mentally stable. He arranges mannequins around the city and talks to them as if they are real. He checks out movies and returns them to the local video store. There is even a female mannequin that Neville doesn’t quite have the nerve to talk to just yet.

While certain points in the plot are very predictable (you’ll see what I’m talking about), others aren’t quite as cut and dry. This isn’t a typical zombie movie. There is a mix of drama, suspense, comedy, and action which I enjoyed. The audience at the theater I went to clearly didn’t appreciate the ending. I can sympathize with them to a point, but who wants a predictable ending all the time? While it wasn’t what I expected, I’m perfectly fine with the theatrical cut ending.

There is an alternate ending floating around on the internet which can be found via a simple Google search. It is even more unpredictable, and I have mixed feelings about which one I prefer. The quote, “What a hilarious misunderstanding,” courtesy of Flight of the Conchords comes to mind. According to some that have read the book, the alternate ending seems more true to the novel than the theatrical cut was.

In any case, I enjoyed the movie, and think many of you would too. Be sure to check out on DVD, which comes out March 18th.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please prove you are a human * Time limit is exhausted. Please reload the CAPTCHA.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Post

Isaac Asimov would have been 90 todayIsaac Asimov would have been 90 today

Nobody is sure when exactly Isaac Asimov was born due to poor record keeping. January 2nd, 1920 was the day Isaac Asimov decided to celebrate his birthday. Along with creating the Three Laws of Robotics, Asimov also unintentionally coined the term robotics. It was first used in print when his short story “Liar!” was published in 1941. He was constantly writing in just about every area of literature. I have primarily read his Science Fiction, but he has done textbooks, humor, mystery, non-fiction, and more.

My first exposure to Asimov’s writing was when my father gave me an old worn out copy of I, Robot. I tucked the book away for a few years and eventually got around to reading it. I was so enthralled with the robots that I eventually read every robot book by him and other authors. This naturally led me to read the Foundation series which I also enjoyed, but I’ve always preferred the robot series. The Robot and Foundation books make up the biggest reading project I have ever completed. Aside from those, I’ve read a bit of his autobiography and plan on sampling some of his other writing in the near future.

By the time I discovered Asimov, he had already died. I wonder how much more he could have written had he not contracted HIV from a blood transfusion he received during heart surgery. He died of myocardial and renal complications on April 6, 1992, but the true cause of his death wasn’t publicized due to the stigma of HIV/AIDS at the time. His work has greatly influenced my love of Science Fiction, and for that I am thankful.

For more information on the life of Isaac Asimov, please visit the official Wikipedia post

Monsters (2010) Directed by Gareth EdwardsMonsters (2010) Directed by Gareth Edwards

Book Cover

A friend of mine recommended that I watch Monsters. It was available on Netflix streaming, so I added it to my queue.  The premise is that a survey mission to investigate extraterrestrial life burned up on reentry to Earth over Latin America. The “Monsters” appear later on, for what seems to be a seasonal basis. They terrorize the locals, and the main character is visiting to try and capture some photographs of the destruction. There is an invasion coming and Andrew, the photographer, is anxious to get some pictures so he can cash in. His plans get interrupted by a demand from the publisher to escort his daughter out of the country. She’s engaged to be married, but the fiancé has already made hit home. Why? Probably some type of fight. The movie came across as being a suspense, romance, and science fiction flick all at the same time. I usually like it when I see genres mixed, but Monsters was spread too thin. Nothing made me think, “this is a good movie.” The action scenes were rather intense, but I didn’t really get scared or startled. The awkward romance that blossomed between the photographer and the girl was predictable. The mystery behind the nature of the Monster invasions was interesting, but not enough to carry the rest of the movie. It wasn’t a bad movie, but not one that I’d recommend someone spend money on to see.

Blade Runner The Final Cut (2007) directed by Ridley Scott coming soonBlade Runner The Final Cut (2007) directed by Ridley Scott coming soon

Blade Runner the Final Cut

I’ve heard rumors of this “Final Cut” of Blade Runner for years. Blade Runner was one of the first movies released on DVD, but was such poor quality I was extremely disappointed. It is definitely one of my favorite movies, and felt a bit cheated that the transfer was so poor. The picture was grainy and the soundtrack was only in Dolby 2.0, not even 5.1 surround sound which was the main advantage to DVD (besides increased resolution) at the time. I’ve been meaning to review the original Director’s Cut DVD (without Rick Deckard’s narration and the happy ending) but haven’t gotten around to it yet.

I’m glad to see that Blade Runner is finally getting the love and care it deserves. I have only seen the Director’s Cut, and have watched just a few scenes of the theatrical release with the narration on cable from time to time. I’m excited to see all of the different versions offered together. There are 3 different releases announced with a variety of alternate cuts of the movie. There is a 2 disc Special Editionamazon link, 4 disc Collector’s Editionamazon link, and 5 disc Ultimate Collector’s Edition (DVDamazon link, HD-DVDamazon link, Blu-rayamazon link). I plan on getting the 4 disc DVD version and reviewing it here in the near future. Both Blu-ray and HD-DVD 5 disc versions are available without the “Ultimate” briefcase for a lower price, but for some reason that option isn’t available for DVD. Don’t miss this release, check out all of the pre-order options (there are MANY) that are available on Amazonamazon link.